Why unmanned systems are central to 21st century military doctrine

A silent shape rises above the horizon, no cockpit, no crew, no hesitation. It scans, it locks, it strikes. Modern military power is no longer measured by boots on the ground but by machines in the sky. Drones or unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) have become central to contemporary warfare, shaping conflicts from Nagorno-Karabakh to Ukraine, the Red Sea to the Line of Control.

Drones are no longer mere gadgets; they are doctrine. They locate targets, jam communications, and strike without risking a pilot’s life. Nations are rapidly building entire ecosystems around UAVs, including sensors, satellites, AI targeting, counter-drone systems, and swarms. In the 21st century, air power is defined less by the size of aircraft than by the intelligence and connectivity of these networks.

Global Drone Scale

Scale matters. The United States operates an estimated 13,000 military drones, far ahead of other powers. Turkey fields around 1,421; Poland, 1,209; Russia, 1,050; Germany, 670; India, 625; France, 591; Australia, 557; South Korea, 518; and Finland, 412. These figures reflect industrial capacity, logistics, and the ability to sustain operations over time. But numbers alone do not tell the full story; capabilities, doctrine, and operational integration define true power.

The U.S. maintains high-end reconnaissance and strike UAVs like the MQ-9 Reaper, alongside maritime platforms and stealth prototypes. Turkey has emerged as a drone exporter with the Bayraktar family, combining endurance, precision, and affordability. Poland’s approach emphasises local manufacturing and layered procurement. Russia relies on massed, Iranian-style attack drones, while India balances imports with growing indigenous systems such as Nagastra-1 loitering munitions, SkyStriker tactical drones, and larger projects like TAPAS (Rustom-2) and Archer-NG.

Doctrine and Combat

Drones are now central to military doctrine. Conflicts in Syria, Armenia-Azerbaijan, and Ukraine have showcased unmanned warfare as a tool of attrition. Cheap quadcopters expose trenches, long-endurance UAVs target supply lines, and drones of all sizes reshape the battlefield. Air superiority today combines traditional fighters with a buzzing cloud of expendable wings.

Drone warfare has a long lineage, from hot-air balloons over Venice in 1849 to Cold War surveillance models and battlefield scouts in the 1980s. What has changed is accessibility and scale: drones now range from palm-sized quadcopters to naval-grade UAVs capable of launching smaller “parasite” drones. Militias can 3D-print parts; militaries can programme swarms. The barrier to entry has collapsed.

Eastern Europe and the Ukraine Example

Ukraine established the world’s first dedicated Unmanned Systems branch, combining racing-drone agility with battlefield lethality. Affordable FPV drones can overwhelm more expensive one-way attack drones, illustrating that victory depends on production speed, logistics, and the depth of the operator pool, not simply on the sophistication of individual UAVs. Russia’s thousands of Shahed-type drones met Ukraine’s massed FPVs and electronic warfare—a brutal contest of tempo, adaptability, and industrial endurance.

Swarms, once science fiction, are becoming military reality. China dominates the civilian drone market, and the technology is now being adapted for warfare. Thousands of drones can operate in concert with satellite guidance, radar, and loitering munitions—effectively creating autonomous, intelligent aerial formations.

South Asia: A New Drone Frontier

In May 2025, drones were at the centre of one of the sharpest India-Pakistan confrontations since 1971. Following a terror attack in Pahalgam, India retaliated with a mix of Israeli-origin UAVs for surveillance and loitering munitions like Harpy and Harop. Poland-supplied Warmate and India’s own SkyStriker drones added precision capabilities. India’s indigenous line-up, from Nagastra-1 to TAPAS and Archer-NG, reflects a shift towards self-reliance.

Pakistan responded with Turkish Bayraktar and Akinci platforms, Chinese CH-4 and Wing Loong II drones, and indigenous Burraq and Shapar types. Swarming experiments reportedly included quadcopters like Asisguard Songar. The contest revealed three key lessons: drones create escalation space, affordability is a weapon, and counter-drone defence is the new air-defence imperative.

The Global Drone Race

Beyond South Asia, the drone race is a worldwide sprint. France develops naval rotorcraft UAVs; Australia fields Tritons and Reapers; South Korea combines domestic production with high-altitude reconnaissance; Finland deploys Israeli-designed light UAVs to brigade level. Philosophies differ: the U.S. prioritises large platforms and integrated intelligence, China focuses on modular swarms and civilian-military fusion, Trkiye leverages cost-effective exports, Russia relies on mass and attrition, Israel emphasises precision, and India pursues a hybrid strategy of buy, build, and integrate.

The competition extends beyond hardware to concepts: AI-enabled target recognition, saturation of air defences, unmanned naval systems, and integration of manned and unmanned formations. Deterrence in the drone age depends on what can be seen, what can be struck, and how quickly forces can regenerate.

U.S. Leadership and Ethical Challenges

The United States remains the benchmark in drone operations, with two decades of integrated strikes across Asia and the Middle East. From the elimination of Mullah Akhtar Mansour in Pakistan to the killing of Ayman al-Zawahiri in Kabul, drones have demonstrated reach, precision, and operational integration. Yet leadership is contested: China, Russia, Trkiye, Israel, and India are each advancing the frontier, reshaping the global balance of unmanned power.

Drones lower the political threshold to use force but raise ethical stakes. Precision and accountability are strategic imperatives; legitimacy itself has become a weapon.

Conclusion

Drones are not a strategy—they are instruments. They can reveal, deter, punish, and protect. But without human judgment, they can misfire or mislead. The future belongs to those who pair machines with strategic insight, mass with restraint, and speed with scrutiny. In an era where war may be waged by algorithms as much as by armies, the promise of drones is not merely that they make war easier—but that they could make the right wars harder to start, and the wrong wars shorter to end.

- Ends