India and Israel voted against a Pakistan-Belarus-backed UN resolution on regional conventional arms control. New Delhi argued that national security concerns extend beyond regional boundaries.

Image used for representational purposes only
Unitednations,Nov 3, 2026 11:04 IST
India and Israel have voted against a draft resolution moved by Pakistan and Belarus at the United Nations on conventional arms control at regional and subregional levels, news agency Press Trust of India reported. India said countries' security concerns were not limited by regional boundaries.
The draft resolution, titled 'General and complete disarmament: Conventional arms control at the regional and subregional levels', was approved by the UN General Assembly's First Committee on Monday with 180 votes in favour, two against and no abstentions. India and Israel were the only countries to oppose it in the 193-member UN body.
Explaining India's vote, First Secretary at India's Permanent Mission to the UN Anmol Sher Bedi said conventional arms control was a global issue. "We are not fully convinced that it should be pursued primarily in regional and sub-regional contexts," Bedi said, according to PTI.
He said India had voted against the resolution in line with its past position. India also questioned its request to the UN Disarmament Commission to consider drawing up principles that could serve as a framework for regional agreements on conventional arms control.
"We read this request with a certain degree of curiosity," Bedi said. He pointed out that the Commission had already adopted by consensus guidelines and recommendations on regional disarmament in 1993, guidelines on conventional arms control and disarmament in 1999, and recommendations on practical confidence-building measures involving conventional weapons in 2017.
"That makes three consensus outcomes on this very subject in the very body now being asked to start from scratch," he said. "We fail to understand why a subject already deliberated at length needs another round of deliberation unless the aim is to keep the UN disarmament machinery busy," Bedi added.
Bedi also objected to the resolution's approach to maintaining a balance in defence capabilities within a region or subregion. "This assumes that the security concerns of States politely stop at their regional borders. They do not," he said.
"Those concerns, as everyone understands for well-known reasons, extend beyond narrowly-defined regions and subregions. More importantly, the notion of preserving balance in a region or a subregion appears unrealistic," Bedi said.
The resolution says conventional arms control should be pursued primarily at regional and subregional levels as most threats to peace and security in the post-Cold War period arise mainly among countries in the same region or subregion. It also seeks to promote agreements aimed at strengthening regional peace and security "at the lowest possible level of armaments and military forces".
India separately voted against a paragraph referring to conventional arms control proposals made in the context of South Asia. The paragraph noted with "particular interest" initiatives in different regions, including consultations among some Latin American countries and "the proposals for conventional arms control made in the context of South Asia", while recognising the relevance of such controls to regional security.
The resolution also says that "militarily significant States and States with larger military capabilities have a special responsibility" to promote agreements for regional security. India maintained that conventional arms control was a global issue and opposed limiting the assessment of countries' security concerns to regional and subregional boundaries.
With PTI Inputs
- Ends

1 hour ago
