California strengthens student privacy against immigration enforcement: Here’s what you need to know

3 hours ago

 Here’s what you need to know

How new California laws protect immigrant students amid rising federal immigration actions. (AI Image)

California has enacted new laws aimed at protecting the privacy of immigrant students amid increasing federal immigration enforcement. These measures restrict immigration officials’ access to schools and prohibit sharing sensitive student information without a judicial warrant.The moves come as Democratic-led states push back against President Trump’s intensified deportation efforts, which include plans to deploy Guard troops to assist immigration agents in key cities. California’s new protections are part of a wider wave of legislation designed to shield vulnerable immigrant communities from federal enforcement actions, as reported by the Associated Press.New laws limit access to schools and protect student informationOne of the key provisions requires schools and higher education institutions to notify students, parents, and staff immediately if immigration officials are present on campus.

This notification rule aims to ensure that students and families are aware of any immigration activity that might affect them. The law also prohibits schools from granting immigration enforcement officials access without a court warrant.Additionally, California now lists immigration status as protected medical information, forbidding healthcare providers from disclosing such details without proper legal process.

These protections extend to schools, libraries, and health care facilities, reinforcing their status as safe spaces.Sergio Jimenez, a street vending organiser with the Community Power Collective in Los Angeles, said the new laws were about “security for human beings” and businesses, as quoted by the Associated Press.Resistance grows among Democratic-led statesCalifornia is not alone in enacting such protections. Other Democratic-led states like Maryland and Oregon have passed similar legislation restricting immigration enforcement access in schools and healthcare settings.

Maryland requires public schools, libraries, and health facilities to limit immigration officials’ access without a court order. Oregon and Rhode Island have laws preventing landlords and health providers from asking about immigration status.In contrast, Republican-led states have largely increased cooperation with federal immigration agents. Participation in the federal 287(g) program, which allows local law enforcement to assist US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), has expanded dramatically—from 135 agreements in 21 states at the start of President Trump’s term to over 1,000 agreements in 40 states.Jessica Vaughan, director of policy studies at the Center for Immigration Studies, said, as quoted by the Associated Press, that states “reflect the polarization of the country on this issue” with some cooperating fully with federal enforcement and others seeking to thwart it.Impact on students and educationThe new laws respond to concerns that immigrant students could be targeted on campus, undermining their safety and access to education.

By restricting immigration enforcement officials’ presence and access, Democratic states aim to create environments where students can learn without fear.California’s measures build on existing laws that bar local authorities from inquiring about immigration status or requiring disclosure of personal information from street vendors, a group that includes many immigrant students working part-time. These laws prevent local databases from being accessed by federal agents without judicial oversight.While some Republican-led states have passed laws limiting public benefits and access to in-state tuition for undocumented students, California remains committed to protecting immigrant communities through privacy and safety legislation, as reported by the Associated Press.These developments highlight the stark divide between states on immigration enforcement and raise questions about how educational institutions can balance legal requirements with student rights and protections.

Read Full Article at Source