Parents who refused ‘vaccinated blood’ transfusion speak out after court places Baby W in care

1 month ago

The family of a baby who has been placed in his doctors’ care because his parents refused to consent to a transfusion of “vaccinated blood” in a life-saving operation have said they will prioritise time with their son before the surgery.

The parents’ lawyer, Sue Grey, said in a Facebook post on Thursday morning that the family would be prioritising “a peaceful time with their baby until the operation, and to support him through the operation”.

“It appears the hospital is planning the operation today or tomorrow,” Grey said. “They have security guards preventing Baby W from leaving the ward.

“We have concluded that the government cannot afford anything to go wrong for Baby W as the world is watching. He is likely to get the best possible care with the best safest blood.”

Grey said the team had considered an appeal, but concluded there was no time to do so.

On Wednesday, a New Zealand high court judge ruled in favour of health authorities who sought guardianship of a baby boy so his operation could proceed. The decision is expected to have wide-ranging ramifications and has become a focus of protests for anti-vaxxers, who held demonstrations outside the courtroom.

The six-month-old, known as Baby W, will not survive without urgent surgery for a congenital heart defect. His parents said they were unwilling to proceed unless they were given a guarantee he would only receive blood from unvaccinated donors.

New Zealand’s health authorities and blood service argued that allowing the parents to refuse vaccinated blood would set a dangerous precedent, in which patients could demand to pick and choose where their blood came from.

The high court decision places the boy in the guardianship of his paediatric heart surgeon and cardiologist “for the purpose of consenting to surgery to address the obstruction and all medical issues related to that surgery, including the administration of blood” said justice Ian Gault in a summary of the judgment.

The judgment noted that dialogue between the specialist doctors and the parents broke down when a meeting was “hijacked by the parent’s support person, who proceeded to pressurise the specialists with her theory about conspiracies in New Zealand and even said that deaths in infants getting transfusions were occurring in Starship hospital”. As a result, the doctors were unable to explain their position to the parents, the judgment said.

The doctors’ guardianship will last from Wednesday until the completion of his surgery and post-operative recovery – likely to be January 2023 at the latest. The parents will retain guardianship in all other matters.

In previous interviews the parents said the baby needed surgery “almost immediately” but that they were “extremely concerned with the blood [the doctors] are going to use”.

Vaccines to prevent severe disease and death from Covid-19 have been found to be extremely safe and effective, with millions of people around the world vaccinated.

The judge noted that New Zealand’s blood service had presented evidence from the past six months of a “significant increase in potential blood recipients asking for blood from unvaccinated donors or asking about directed donation. Similar trends have been noted in other countries.”

The case was filed by the Auckland health service Te Whatu Ora. In a statement last week its interim director, Dr Mike Shepherd, said: “The decision to make an application to the court is always made with the best interests of the child in mind.”

Read Full Article at Source